Komunitas Pembelajaran Profesional Guru di Sekolah Dasar Tangerang: Negosiasi Kultural, Kepemimpinan Berlapis, dan Transformasi Sistemik

Cecep Maman Hermawan; Okta Rosfiani; Gunawan Santoso

doi:10.9000/jupetra.v4i3.2212

Authors

Cecep Maman Hermawan Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
Okta Rosfiani Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
Gunawan Santoso Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9000/jupetra.v4i3.2212

Keywords:

Kelompok Pembelajaran Profesional; Kinerja Guru; Kepemimpinan Sekolah; Studi Kasus Kualitatif; Sekolah Dasar.

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh terbatasnya jumlah studi tentang implementasi Komunitas Pembelajaran Profesional (PLC) di sekolah dasar di Indonesia, meskipun dampaknya signifikan terhadap peningkatan kinerja guru dan mutu pendidikan. Tujuan studi ini adalah menganalisis peran PLC dalam meningkatkan kinerja guru dan mengidentifikasi faktor pendukung serta hambatan di Kota Tangerang. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus, melibatkan 12 partisipan (kepala sekolah dan guru) dari empat sekolah dasar yang dipilih secara purposive sampling. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi partisipan, dan analisis dokumen, kemudian dianalisis secara tematis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PLC meningkatkan kolaborasi, inovasi pedagogis (misalnya, pengembangan modul yang terdiferensiasi), dan motivasi guru melalui refleksi kolektif. Faktor pendukung utama meliputi kepemimpinan transformasional kepala sekolah, alokasi dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) Berbasis Kinerja, dan sinergi dengan kebijakan Penggerak Sekolah. Hambatan meliputi beban kerja guru (24–30 jam/minggu), resistensi budaya, dan fragmentasi program dengan Kelompok Kerja Guru (KKG)/Kelompok Kerja Guru (MGMP). Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa PLC efektif jika didukung oleh kepemimpinan kolaboratif dan kebijakan inklusif. Implikasi teoretis memperkaya konsep komunitas pembelajaran profesional dalam konteks Indonesia, sementara implikasi praktis merekomendasikan integrasi teknologi untuk diskusi asinkron dan pelatihan fasilitasi bagi kepala sekolah.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey & Company.

Bakkenes, I. (2010). Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams. [Disertasi doktoral, Universitas Utrecht].

Bolam, R. (2005). Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities. Research Report 637. University of Bristol.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, *9*(2), 27–40.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, *3*(2), 77–101.

Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, *18*(8), 947–967.

Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, *39*(3), 124–130.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, *8*(1), 1–44.

DuFour, R. (2008). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Solution Tree Press.

DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2010). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Solution Tree Press.

Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change. John Wiley & Sons.

Guastello, S. J. (2000). Symbolic dynamic patterns of written exchanges: Hierarchical structures in an electronic problem-solving group. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, *4*(2), 123–150.

Hendrickx, M., et al. (2025). Teacher interaction patterns in professional learning communities: A cross-cultural analysis. [Manuskrip dalam persiapan].

Hermawan, A., et al. (2024). Implementasi Kelompok Belajar Profesional di Sekolah Dasar Kota Tangerang. Laporan Penelitian. Dinas Pendidikan Kota Tangerang.

Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Lomos, C., Hofman, R. H., & Bosker, R. J. (2011). Professional communities and student achievement—A meta-analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, *22*(2), 121–148.

Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers' work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, *106*(4), 532–575.

Meesuk, P., Wongrugsa, A., & Wangkaewhiran, T. (2021). The development of professional learning communities in Thai schools: A secondary analysis. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, *42*(1), 61–66.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Nuryadin, A. (2019). Tantangan pengembangan profesional guru di Indonesia: Studi kasus implementasi KBP. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, *8*(2), 112–125.

Owen, S. (2014). Teacher professional learning communities: Going beyond contrived collegiality toward challenging debate and collegial learning and professional growth. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, *54*(2), 54–77.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, *42*(5), 533–544.

Rahman, A., & Amri, S. (2018). Evaluasi model kelompok belajar profesional di Aceh. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, *15*(1), 45–60.

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. Dalam R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 397–417). Cambridge University Press.

Stoll, L. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, *7*(4), 221–258.

Tam, A. C. F. (2015). The role of a professional learning community in teacher change: A perspective from beliefs and practices. Teachers and Teaching, *21*(1), 22–43.

Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, *24*(1), 80–91.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.